Research and Publications
ISO 15858:2016 UVC Devices - Safety info - Permissible human exposure
Ping Hu: Mar 5, 2024
ACGIH 2021 Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices
Ping Hu: Mar 5, 2024
Evaluating Corneal Damage from 222-nm and 254-nm UV Light in Rats
Ping Hu: Mar 5, 2024
Far-UVC Krypton Chloride Lamps-Safer DNA Exposure Compared to Sunlight
Ping Hu: Mar 5, 2024
Far-UVC: Innovative Solution to Airborne Microbial Disease Control
UV Medico: Mar 4, 2024
Far-UVC - Effectively Disinfects SARS-CoV-2 Surface Contamination
UV Medico: Mar 4, 2024
222 nm Far-UVC Light Safely Inactivates Airborne Human Coronaviruses
UV Medico: Mar 4, 2024
Ultraviolet Lighting During Orthopaedic Surgery and Rate of Infection
UV Medico: Mar 4, 2024
Far-UVC Light Proven Safe: No DNA Damage or Skin Lesions in Mice
UV Medico: Mar 4, 2024
Far-UVC: Significantly Safer for Eyes, Proven by Corneal Damage Study
UV Medico: Mar 4, 2024
Long-Term Study: UVC Lamps Safe for Mice Sensitive to UV Radiation
UV Medico: Mar 4, 2024
Far-UVC: New Tool for Controlling Airborne Microbial Diseases
UV Medico: Mar 4, 2024
Far-UVC (222 nm) Safely Inactivates Airborne Human Coronaviruses
UV Medico: Mar 4, 2024
Far-UVC reduces the level of infectious airborne virus
A new study published in Scientific Reports shows that Far-UVC light at 222 nm can effectively kill airborne pathogens. The research, conducted in a room-sized chamber, found that Far-UVC light can greatly reduce harmful viruses like influenza and...
Read More
ISO 15858:2016 UVC Devices - Safety info - Permissible human exposure
The International Organization for Standardization 15858 was developed to highlight the minimum specifications on UVC safety for products and...
ACGIH 2021 Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) is a scientific, private, non-profit, and nongovernmental corporation. They...
1 min read
Evaluating Corneal Damage from 222-nm and 254-nm UV Light in Rats
222nm ultraviolet (UV) light produced by a krypton–chlorine excimer lamp is harmful to bacterial cells but not to skin. However, the effects of...
Far-UVC Krypton Chloride Lamps-Safer DNA Exposure Compared to Sunlight
This study used computer modeling to examine the DNA damage risk from far-UVC light versus sunlight. Results focused on CPD formation (a DNA damage...
1 min read
Far-UVC: Innovative Solution to Airborne Microbial Disease Control
Airborne-mediated microbial diseases such as influenza and tuberculosis represent major public health challenges. A direct approach to prevent...
1 min read
Far-UVC - Effectively Disinfects SARS-CoV-2 Surface Contamination
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has emerged as a serious...
1 min read
222 nm Far-UVC Light Safely Inactivates Airborne Human Coronaviruses
A direct approach to limit airborne viral transmissions is to inactivate them within a short time of their production. Germicidal ultraviolet light,...
Ultraviolet Lighting During Orthopaedic Surgery and Rate of Infection
In this study, Ritter et al. compared the disinfection efficacy of laminar airflow (LAF) and conventional UV light over a nineteen-year period in...
Far-UVC Light Proven Safe: No DNA Damage or Skin Lesions in Mice
In this study, chronic irradiation with 222 nm UVC light was revealed not to induce mutagenic or cytotoxic effects in the epidermis of mice. These...
.png)
.png)

.png)
.png)



.png)




