Far-UVC Krypton Chloride Lamps-Safer DNA Exposure Compared to Sunlight
UV Medico
:
Mar 5, 2024 10:06:19 AM

This study used computer modeling to examine the DNA damage risk from far-UVC light versus sunlight. Results focused on CPD formation (a DNA damage marker) in two climates: Harwell, England, and Thessaloniki, Greece.
- Key Findings:
- 10 minutes of sunlight (UV Index 4) caused as much CPD damage as 700 hours of unfiltered far-UVC or 30,000+ hours of filtered far-UVC exposure at the basal skin layer.
- Sunlight poses a significantly greater DNA damage risk than far-UVC.
Latest knowledge from UV Medico

1 min read
Far-UVC: Innovative Solution to Airborne Microbial Disease Control


1 min read
Mouse Skin Reactions to 222nm and 235nm UV-C Light Exposure


UVC Light: A Safer Alternative for Reducing Surgical Site Infections


1 min read
Safe Long-Term Use of 222 nm UVC Lamps on UV-Sensitive Mice


222 nm Far-UVC Light Safely Inactivates Airborne Human Coronaviruses
