Far-UVC Krypton Chloride Lamps-Safer DNA Exposure Compared to Sunlight
Ping Hu
:
Mar 5, 2024, 10:06:19 AM
This study used computer modeling to examine the DNA damage risk from far-UVC light versus sunlight. Results focused on CPD formation (a DNA damage marker) in two climates: Harwell, England, and Thessaloniki, Greece.
- Key Findings:
- 10 minutes of sunlight (UV Index 4) caused as much CPD damage as 700 hours of unfiltered far-UVC or 30,000+ hours of filtered far-UVC exposure at the basal skin layer.
- Sunlight poses a significantly greater DNA damage risk than far-UVC.
Latest knowledge from UV Medico
1 min read
Far-UVC: Innovative Solution to Airborne Microbial Disease Control
Far-UVC (222 nm) Safely Inactivates Airborne Human Coronaviruses
222 nm Far-UVC Light Safely Inactivates Airborne Human Coronaviruses
Far-UVC Light Proven Safe: No DNA Damage or Skin Lesions in Mice
1 min read
Evaluating Corneal Damage from 222-nm and 254-nm UV Light in Rats
Ultraviolet Lighting During Orthopaedic Surgery and Rate of Infection
ISO 15858:2016 UVC Devices - Safety info - Permissible human exposure
.png)
.png)

.png)
.png)



.png)




