Far-UVC Krypton Chloride Lamps-Safer DNA Exposure Compared to Sunlight
UV Medico
:
Mar 5, 2024 10:06:19 AM
This study used computer modeling to examine the DNA damage risk from far-UVC light versus sunlight. Results focused on CPD formation (a DNA damage marker) in two climates: Harwell, England, and Thessaloniki, Greece.
- Key Findings:
- 10 minutes of sunlight (UV Index 4) caused as much CPD damage as 700 hours of unfiltered far-UVC or 30,000+ hours of filtered far-UVC exposure at the basal skin layer.
- Sunlight poses a significantly greater DNA damage risk than far-UVC.
Latest knowledge from UV Medico
1 min read
Far-UVC: Innovative Solution to Airborne Microbial Disease Control
1 min read
Mouse Skin Reactions to 222nm and 235nm UV-C Light Exposure
UVC Light: A Safer Alternative for Reducing Surgical Site Infections
1 min read
Safe Long-Term Use of 222 nm UVC Lamps on UV-Sensitive Mice
UV222™
UV222 Linear
UV222 Downlight
Vertex 222
UV222 Pendant
UV222 Booth
UV222 Step-On
UV222 Cleanroom Downlight
DUO 222 Downlight
UV222 Material Airlock
UV222 Ambulance
UV222 Compact
UV222 Industrial